Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 30
Journal list menu
The presence of distinctive subcultures leads to postmodern speculation about its radical deconstructive effect on identity and on culture in general. This portal would open each individual world to the values and habits of peer groups, meaning the return, in new terms, of the other-directed self. First, one finds a common emphasis on the symbolic nature of social life. Accordingly, with this approach, the formation of social worlds implies symbolic interaction.
- Decision Support Systems in Critical Care.
- Symbolic interactionism?
- Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 30 (Studies in Symbolic Interaction).
- The Laughing Classroom: Everyones Guide to Teaching with Humor and Play (Loomans, Diane).
Language is the environment that shapes the communicative exchange. This dynamism implied to avoid an essentialist view on identities and taking into account the presence of several variables in meaning generation. What defines communication is that is a shared experience. It would be also a ritual of sharing, participation and possession of common beliefs. This concept of political participation would be a major insight and it will be present either in the Pragmatist concept of public either in its rejection of democratic elitism Silveirinha, This concept will be present in many major contemporary philosophical developments through authors such as Habermas, Rorty and Apel.
This first phase will include the founding philosophical fathers Peirce, Dewey, James and Mead and the founding sociological pioneers of interactionist research: Charles Cooley, William Thomas, Florian Znaniecky and Robert Park. Hughes Denzin, Denzin also identifies a fifth period between and identified as ethnographic period strongly devoted to qualitative research.
The sixth period, beginning in the eighties, showed the resurgence of interest on dramaturgy and an increasing dialogue with phenomenology, feminism and cultural studies, where Denzin would play itself a major rule. Since the eighties, interactionism lost some of its adversarial and critical tune with mainstream social theory accepting its emphases on meaning, agency, and the interpretive analysis of interactional processes.
Recently, one finds the emergence of new research directed to interaction in digital networks Rodriguez, ; Markham, ; Salvini, However, Denzin in , was completely aware of the influence of Schutz who, after his arrival to America, in , wrote important essays on the pragmatists, published in American Journal of Sociology Schutz, ; ; a: ; b: ; c: This awareness was significant because only the centenary of Schutz fully reveal all its importance the phenomenological movement and particularly to the dialogue between Phenomenology and Pragmatism.
Schutz points out that the world where we live is made of meanings, built by ourselves and by our precedents. Understanding those meanings is the human way of living in the social world. This premise is an ontological rather than a methodological condition. Intersubjectivity emerges as an a priori for all the direct human experience in life- world. At the level of everyday life and natural attitude, is taken for granted by the common sense knowledge that the social world is a shared one, appearing as identical for all the participants.
Each individual act performed by each person supposes the sharing of the same meaningful universe, identical for all. Language and meaning are rooted in the world, making it possible simultaneously.
Shared knowledge on reality is conceived as starting from receipts and typical behaviors, understood in a way that assures the consistence and continuity of social order. For Schutz, the world of contemporaries is a structure of typifications Schutz, In spite of accepting that we are recipients of events beyond our control, there are also relevancies that are the outcomes of our chosen interests, established by our spontaneous decision to solve a problem by our own thinking Schutz, a: Through the influence of William James, Schutz points out that social actor perceived the world as a multiplicity of realities, which he calls provinces of finite meaning.
For each one of these provinces one finds a correlative type of relationship between conscience and world. Aesthetic fruition, labor activities, religious ecstasies, entertainment experiences, fantasy plays, dreams implied distinct ways of thinking and being in the world Schutz, Each one of these regions has both an objective and a subjective side. The objective side is, thus, compound by a kind of knowledge of ready-made categories before referred as typifications.
Mead and, particularly, Park were well acquainted with the sociological and phenomenological German thought. Finally, Chicago scholars and phenomenological social philosophers have a recognized common debt to Georg Simmel, philosopher and sociologist strongly interested in the ecology of urban environments Wolff, We find his presence either in phenomenological sociology either in the symbolic interactionism.
They all discuss identity and selfhood as products of social forces, shaped by everyday interactions and by struggles and negotiations over acceptable social meanings. People are seen as engaged in a constant effort to establish order so that collective shared meanings are possible. Theoretical developments in either phenomenological sociology or symbolic interactionism call for a closer look to individual participation in social movements in order to bring to light its symbolic dimensions, without neglecting the crucial role played by structural objective constraints.
Pestello and Saxon considered that interactionism could act as sociology of difference, supporting democracy as the proper arrangement required to give voice and recognition to the self. In a similar style, many sociological phenomenologists also follow a critical look to phenomena of power and domination. Social action becomes possible only in a kind of dialectical play between the subjective world and objective structures in social networks. The construction of a consistent narrative implies no more an essentialist conception of identity but an answer to an increasingly reflexive environment.
Many early theorists of Internet argue against a Unitarian concept of self.
However, the assumption that, before Internet, there was a commonly accepted idea of self as a Unitarian phenomenon is not in any way, a linear one. The main concern of sociology, hermeneutics and critical theory was to establish that human being is constituted "in the world" before any kind of artificial distinction between subject and object. Every project of conceiving ties between subject and world as something that happens a posteriori was already, at best, simply used as a metaphor with analytical value.
Interactionism, hermeneutic and phenomenological points of view share an emphasis on communication as central to any definition of identity or self. They assume the existence of a world of shared common meanings that are produced and processed by social actors in a dynamic that is neither free of conflict, nor free of social constraints. On the opposite side, some postmodern writers on Internet alleged that the self is connected to society only in terms of power and political domination describing this in poststructuralist terms. While society was understood as a universe of domination, Internet was presented as providing people the opportunity to abandon the confines of a limiting self.
Assuming that many of those narratives were simply metaphorical, and even accepting the legitimacy of literature and art to describe social universe with impressive insights, this specific glance is not free from criticism and academic discussion. Internet nature or essence would be independent of their social uses, disregarding any hermeneutical approach to understanding its social appropriation.
Related books and articles
This approach does not mean in any way that technologies are irrelevant in themselves. To attend closely to technical objects themselves is not to say that we can ignore the contexts in which those objects are situated Winner, Technologies reflect political options but those political options also reflect their projected human use in social contexts.
The autonomy of the self is not the outcome of a process in which social ties were broken by the increasing independence from constraints of social life. On the contrary, the autonomous identity is the outcome of a social process in which the actor builds his narrative and his own meanings inside the social horizons shared with significant others. First, social web web 2. Shopping, chatting, dating, making gossips, discussing football and politics, exchanging family photos are common ordinary activities. Not questioning the relevance of Internet and its impact on almost every aspects of life, there is a kind of assimilation process by ordinary life-world.
The undeniable changes in economy, politics, education, cognition, socialization and culture are everywhere but they are being absorbed by everydayness. On the other hand, the kind of imaginary that haunts the primordial of Cyberculture remain less visible, restricted to aesthetics and creative domains or to mainstream popular culture.
- Shakespeare, the Queens Men, and the Elizabethan performance of history.
- Números em texto integral.
- Symbolic interactionism - Wikipedia.
- Marketing Finance: Turning Marketing Strategies into Shareholder Value.
- Article excerpt!
In spite of that, this kind of approach is still influent in some euphoric narratives on the participative possibilities of internet. Research alerts us to the presence of domination processes in the virtual world. The introduction of social interaction technologies have given evidence to connections between online and off line world. Social Web initiated the possibility of merging various social interactive features of the Internet in one platform.
It does not seem much more productive to replace some early mysticism with an ideal picture of the online ordinary world, disregarding critical points particularly disturbing to the autonomy of social agents. Business and identities are closely related at least since the beginning of capitalist modernity.
Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 30 (Studies in Symbolic Interaction) - PDF Free Download
The domestication of bodies and behaviors is statistically relevant for an economy increasingly dependent on immaterial concepts such as memory, culture and identity. Additionally, one must consider the critical importance of understanding what does objectively means the autonomy of public discourse inside global platforms of social network strongly dependent from global major corporations: Facebook, You Tube, Twitter and many other. The expanded ability for individuals to negotiate shared meanings and identities induces contradictory results being some of them incompatible with the idea of an expanded critical mind.
Today, many scholars share a high level of concern with social networks, particularly mobile communication because of the permanent and ubiquitous connection established among individuals making themselves more dependent on preconceptions that are dominant in the communities to which they belong.
The adoption of this point of view includes the suspicion of a social regression induced by new media, due to the retribalization of social world brought by digital networks and mobile communication. In spite of allowing access to a huge diversity of contents, research showed that users, wherever they are, often remain confined themselves to their private world, connecting by e-mail, Skype and message service to their usual acquaintances Fidalgo, Social media and mobile communication seems to induce the return of some characteristics of life style more adjusted to pre-modern relationships.
At least in some situations this universal and ubiquitous presence of significant Others seem to be unsuitable for an idea of a cosmopolitan vibrant public sphere. On the contrary, it allows behaviors adjusted to the idea of the crowd or mass , as a kind of acritical way of sociability opposed to the public that emerges from collective emotional experiences, as an heterogeneous and emotional community dominated by material interests Tarde ; Blumer, Each one of us is not anymore imagined as a disembodied self, free from physical and social constraints particularly in a world where a mobile device is always at hand, loaded with social expectation and shared emotions.
The presence of the in-group and significant others grew stronger emphasizing social support demands. My look is given first of all in my proper name by which I am called and through which my presence is communicated throughout the community. This core of my whoness, my very own, singular proper name, is associated with what is heard and said about me, i. My singularity as this unique human being is first of all signaled or signposted by my unique proper name, which situates it, against the grain, within the universal element of language.
I am therefore-at heart a contradiction, for I am identified with what I am not, viz. Furthermore, my identity is elaborated in language in articulating my reputation, my standing in the view of others, by identifying my proper name with actions, abilities, attitudes, behaviors, etc.
Studies in Symbolic Interaction
My unique singularity is always already exposed to the universal element of language, and through language, who I am becomes manipulable by others merely a particular human being, no longer singular, but marked beneath the universal of human beings by a specific difference, namely, the properties or qualities that, as predicates of my proper name, serve to characterize me Eldred, Even considering elements of negotiation, consensus achievement and dissidence, political discussion must have in mind the continuous exposition to the look of others in a hyper-connected world.
Turkle remembered the critical Sociologist David Riesman whom in the mids, remarked on the American turn from an inner- to an other-directed sense of self, heavily dependent from social approval. Without a firm inner sense of purpose, people looked to their neighbor for validation and social approval.
Today, cell phone in hand, other-directedness is raised to a higher power. This also brings to mind the concern that contemporary media and the Internet have a culture of polarization, in which people primarily seek out points of view to which they already subscribe Sunstein, They are just reproducing a collective phenomenon shared by many: exposing the joy of being seen, of going public to everyone 's eyes as if this predisposition to visibility was something good in itself , and , on the contrary , the desire of intimacy was something intrinsically wrong.
They are happy for having their portraits shared with many others because they have just the right attitude of being available for the Others glance.